Comparison of .po file editors
As gettext is used quite a lot, people have developed tools to edit .po files. Here is a list of the most commonly used with their respective advantages and disadvantages.
Note that the InDiCo project now uses a Transifex project for collaborative translation of all PO files.
Follow that link to request your participation.
poedit
| FOR |
AGAINST |
- Possible to go to references by simple right click
- Search possible
- Color differentiates untranslated, fuzzy, translated
|
- Not possible to edit multiple languages in parallel
- Local installation
- Needs administrator rights to be installed
|
KBabel
| FOR |
AGAINST |
|
|
- Not yet available on window (part of KDE)
- TODO
|
pootle
| FOR |
AGAINST |
- No local installation needed
- TODO
|
- Need to install an apache server
- Complicated to configure
- TODO
|
Launchpad translations / "Rosetta"
| FOR |
AGAINST |
- No local installation needed
- Suggestion then validation, anyone can contribute
- Possible to view current translation and existing suggestions
- Possibility to look at translations to another language
|
- Not possible to directly see the referenced files
- Project would need to be on launchpad!
|